Image Source : Newsbook Bill-Malti
The SMEs Chamber has expressed deep concerns over the proposed inquiries reform, fearing that it may undermine the independence of the judiciary. This concern is rooted in the principle that the judiciary should be insulated from external influences, allowing judges to make impartial decisions based on the law and facts of each case.¹ The SMEs Chamber emphasizes that any changes to the inquiries process should reinforce trust in the system, rather than diminish it.
Judicial independence is a cornerstone of democratic societies, ensuring that the rule of law is upheld and that citizens have access to fair and impartial justice. The proposed reforms, however, have raised fears that the judiciary’s independence may be compromised, potentially leading to a loss of public trust in the system. The SMEs Chamber’s concerns are echoed by experts who stress that judicial independence is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process and upholding the principles of democracy.
In light of these concerns, it is essential that any reforms to the inquiries process be carefully considered, with a focus on maintaining the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. This may involve ensuring that judges are protected from external pressures, that the judicial selection process is transparent and merit-based, and that the judiciary has the necessary resources and support to function effectively. Ultimately, the goal of any reforms should be to strengthen the judiciary and reinforce public trust in the system, rather than undermining the independence of the judiciary.
