Image Source : NewsBook
In a significant ruling, the Maltese courts have overturned a permit granted by the Planning Authority for the development of the Ramel Buildings in Sliema. The permit had allowed for the addition of extra floors to the building, which is considered a landmark in the area. However, the court’s decision has been welcomed by environmental NGOs and local residents, who had argued that the development would have had a negative impact on the area.
The court’s ruling was made in response to an appeal lodged by an NGO, which had challenged the Planning Authority’s decision to grant the permit. The NGO had argued that the development would have been out of character with the surrounding area and would have caused significant harm to the environment. The court agreed with the NGO’s arguments, stating that the development “should not even have been considered” due to its potential impact on the area.
The Ramel Buildings are a well-known landmark in Sliema, and the proposed development had been met with significant opposition from local residents and environmental groups. The building’s historic significance and its prominent location in the area made it a sensitive site for development, and many argued that any changes to the building should have been carefully considered and subject to strict planning controls.
The court’s decision is a significant victory for environmental groups and local residents, who had fought tirelessly to protect the area from over-development. The ruling sends a strong message that the Planning Authority must take into account the potential impact of development on the environment and local communities, and that permits should only be granted for developments that are sustainable and in line with the area’s character.
The decision is also a testament to the importance of community engagement and activism in shaping the future of our built environment. By speaking out against the development and challenging the Planning Authority’s decision, local residents and environmental groups were able to bring about a positive outcome that will help to protect the area for future generations.
